May 12, 2008

ISO 13485 vs GMP

We had an ISO 13485 audit a few weeks ago, one thing I learned is that ISO is much stricter about management review meeting content than GMP. 820.20(3)(c):

Management review. Management with executive responsibility shall review the suitability and effectiveness of the quality system at defined intervals and with sufficient frequency according to established procedures to ensure that the quality system satisfies the requirements of this part and the manufacturer's established quality policy and objectives. The dates and results of quality system reviews shall be documented.

That is pretty broad, while ISO 13485 5.6.2 has more specific requirements that auditors look for in a management review, like confirming if any major regulatory standards referenced in the Quality Manual have been updated or not, customer feedback, non-conformances, etc. GMP doesn't even state CAPAs must be reviewed (I suppose you could argue 820.20(3)(i or ii), but it isn't specific). A good auditor knows about 20 of these ISO/GMP differences and can focus in on them and find them in about 15 minutes. It would be a long day for the Quality department if they had any pride!

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

I found it the other way around. ISO13485 just a simple audit, therefore, it really depends upon the auditors on how to pursue the compliances or the non-conformances. GMP is generally much harder audit since this is a regulatory process, while ISO13485 is a peridical process. GMP is audited in a detail oriented based on a specific assignment eg Medical Devices, while ISO13485 is more into documentation process.

ISO Consultant said...

I believe this information helps in implementation of ISO 13485 standard for Medical Devices and Quality System as well as ISO 13485 certification.
ISO 13485 Manual

Charles Wilson said...

Great to hear your views and that you found the article interesting.Thanks for reading our blog ! We’ll be posting more blogs on ISO 13485 training.

ISO 13485 Consultancy

www.majakel.co.uk said...

Hello, I love your post. I'd like to share. Most worldwide medical device market controllers oblige manufacturers to execute a quality administration framework (QMS) as a major aspect of their item enlistment exertion. In most nations, ISO 13485 certification is the favored or obliged strategy for gathering QMS prerequisites. thanks all~ Steven Patterson

Unknown said...

Hey,The essential target of ISO 13485:2003 is to encourage corresponded medical device administrative prerequisites for quality administration frameworks. Therefore, it incorporates some specific prerequisites for medical devices and prohibits a portion of the necessities of ISO 9001 that are not suitable as administrative prerequisites. Due to these rejections, associations whose quality administration frameworks comply with this International Standard can't assert adjustment to ISO 9001 unless their quality administration frameworks adjust to all the necessities of ISO 9001.Thank you!!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Majakel Medical

Charles Wilson said...

Thank you for your feedback. We're glad you enjoyed the post. Feel free to share it with others you think may benefit from this information.

ISO 13485 Procedures

FenixSEO said...

Hi fellas,
Thank you so much for this wonderful article really!
If someone want to read more about that ISO13485 I think this is the right place for you!

Anonymous said...

I appreciate your post, very good blog about iso implementation

iso 13485 italy

Anonymous said...

very nice blog !

iso 13845 certification